"과학문화교육"

2013-12-20 (Vol 10, No 17)

로그인 | 웹진 | 한마당

먼젓글  |  다음글  |  차례

외국 과학문화교육의 면모

참고문헌

국문

[1] 권성기 역/노박 등 저. (2012/20). 인간 구성주의 과학수업. 양서원
[2] 김진수. (2012). STEAM 교육론. 양서원
[3] 김진용 외. (2011). 미국의 STEM교육 정책 동향(1). KISTEP 조사자료
[4] 네이버. 미국의 역사. www.naver.com
[5] 노화준. (2012). 정책학 원론-복잡성과학과의 융합학문적시각(제3전정판). 박영사
[6] 박도영. (2011). 미국의 K-16 STEM 교육, 위즈덤교육포럼 자료집
[7] 박도영. (2011). 한국인이 본 국제적인 과학교육 통합과 한국의 연구 및 실천과제
[8] 박세훈. (2008). 변하고 있는 미국 교육. 원미사
[9] 박승재. (1968). PSSC 활동에 대한 연구. 서울대학교교육대학원논문집.1권1호.
[10] 박승재. (2009]. 외국 과학관의 조사. 과학문화교육연구소
[11] 서은경 역/앤드류 코울슨 저. (2005). 위기의 교육과 교육시장-미국 교육의 숨겨진 역사. 자유기업원 나남출판
[12] 서혜애 .오필석 .홍재식 역/미국국립학술원 편. (2000/1996).
국가과학교육기준-미국의 과학교육 개혁. 교육과학사
[13] 성열관 역/마이클 애플 저. (2003). 미국 교육개혁, 옳은 길로 가고 있나. 우리교육
[14] 염철현. (2010). 오바마 정부 교육개혁의 동향과 시사점. 비교교육연구. 제20권 제2호. pp.149-168
[15] 염철현. (2012). 오바마 정부의 낙오학생방지법(NCLB) 수정안 고찰 및 시사점. 교육법학연구. 제24권 2호. pp.43-66.
[16] 오천석 역/죤 듀이 저. (1957/1938). 경험과 교육. 풍국학원
[17] 윤재원 역/다이앤 래비치 저. (2011/2010). 미국의 공교육 개혁, 그 빛과 그림자. 지식의날개
[18] 이원식. CHEM 화학 과정, 서울대학교 교육대학원 논문집 제1권 제1호
[19] 임현경 역/리처드 위트마이어. (2012/). 미셸리 잠든 교실을 깨워라. 청림출판
[20] 장창원. 신도철. 장병열. (2011). 국가 신 경쟁력 제고를 위한 과학.기술 교육 혁신방안. 한국직업능력개발원.
[21] 정진우 역/죠지 드보어 저. (1999/1991). 과학교육사. 시그마프레스
[22] 조향숙. 조광희. 이용래. 최지선. (2008). 수학.과학 교육 경쟁력 강화를 위한 수학.과학 교육 내실화 방안 연구.
교육과학기술부
[23] 조희형. (1994). 과학-기술-사회와 과학교육. 교육과학사
[24] 최경희. (1996). STS 교육의 이해와 적용. 교학사
[25] 최희선. (2006). 교육정책의 탐구논리. 교육과학사
[26] 한국교육개발원 역/미국교육진흥위원회 저. (1983/1983).
미국의 교육위기-미국 국민에게 보내는 공개서한, 국가의 위기: 교육개혁의 필요성
[27] 한국교육개발원 역. (1991/). 미국 2000: 교육전략-부시 대통령의 교육개혁안-
[28] 한국과학창의재단. (2009). 국내외 수학.과학 및 창의교육 정책동향 및 교육사례 조사 분석
[29] 홍원표.(2011). 오바마 이후 미국 교육과정 정책의 동향과 쟁점: 국가 교육정을 향한 긴 여정과 불확실한 결과.
교육과정연구 제29권제4호.한국교육과정학회

영문
[30] America COMPETES Act(ACA). (2007).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_COMPETES_Act [March 2013]
[31] American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1967). Science-A Process Approach
[32] American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for All Americans.
Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/sfaatoc.htm [2011].
[33] American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy.
Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
[33b] American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2000). Designs for Science Literacy
[34] American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2007). Atlas of Science Literacy, Volumes 1 and 2.
Project 2061. Washington, DC: Author.
[35] American Chemical Society, this is an overview with recommendations of science education policy in the U.S.
http://portal.acs.org/portal/acs/corg/content?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=PP_SUPERARTICLE&node_id=1892
&use_sec=false&sec_url_var=region1&__uuid=2e89c38a-be53-4208-b34d-e04936fbf68b
[36] American Geological Society, this is an overview of science policy as it occurred in 2000
http://www.agiweb.org/gap/legis106/ike106.html#recent
[37] American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. (2009). Available:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009 [March 2013]
[38] Bianchini, J. A., & Kelly, G. J. (2003). Challenges of standards-based reform:
The example of California's science content standards and textbook adoption process.
Science Education, 87, 378-389.
[39] Business-Higher Education Forum's(BHEF). (2010).
In creasing the number of STEM Graduates: insights from the U.S. STEM Education & Modeling Project.
Available: http://www.bhef.com/ [March 2013]
[40] Bybee, Rodger W. (1993). Reforming Science Education-Social Perspectives and Personal Reflections.
Teachers College, Columbian University, New York and London
[40b] Bybee, R. (2009). K-12 Engineering Education Standards: Opportunities and Barriers.
Paper presented at the National Academy of Engineering Workshop on Standards for K-12 Engineering Education, Washington, DC.
[40c] Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70 (1), 30-35.
[41] Cobern, W. (1996). Constructivism and Non-Western Science Education Research.
International Journal of Science Education, 4(3): 287-302.
[42] Cohen, D. K., & Spillane, J. P. (1992). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction.
Review of research in Education, 18, 3-49.
[42b] Cohen, L.B., and Chashon, C.H. (2006). Infant cognition.
In W. Damon and R.M. Lerner (Eds.),
Handbook of Child Psychology, Set, 6th Edition (Chapter 5, vol. 2). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
[43] Conference on Nationwide Problems of Science Teaching in the Secondary School. (1953).
Harvard University
[44] Coulson, Andrew J. (1999). Market Education-The Unknown History. Social Philosopy and Policy Centre
[45] Council on Competitiveness. (2005). Innovate America - National Innovation Initiative Sumit Report
[46] Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence.
In Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1),
[47] DCI Arrangements of the Next Generation Science Standards. (2013).
Available: http://www.nextgenscience.org/search-standards-dci [2013]
[48] DeBoer, G.E. (1991). A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for Practice.
New York: Teachers College Press.
[49] Dewey. Jhon/John. (1938). Experience and Education, by KAPPA DELTA PI. The Macmillan Company, New York
[50] Driver, R., & Bell, B. (1986). Students' thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view.
School Science, 67, 443-456.
[51] Elementary and Secondary Education Act(ESEA).
Available: http://www.ed.gov/esea [March 2013]
[52] Federal document explaining how "guidance documents" to be used to guide science education policy in the U.S. should be handled
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/fedreg/2007/012507_good_guidance.pdf
[53] Fensham, P. (2009). Real world contexts in PISA science: Implications for context-based science education.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8): 884-896.
[54] Harms, N.C. (1977). Project Synthesis: An interpretative consolidation of research identifying needs in natural science education.
(A proposal prepared for the National Science Foundation) Boulder: University of Colorado.
[55] Harvard Committee. (1955). General Education in a Free Society-Report of the Harvard Committee with
an introduction by James Bryant Conant,
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
[56] Heritage Foundation. (2009). Improving U.S. Competitiveness with K-12 STEM Education and Training.
A Report on the STEM Education and National Security Conference. Heritage
www.heritage.org/Research/Education/sr0057.cfm
[57] Hurd, P.D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13-16.
[58] ICASE. (1981). Energy and Environment Education in EUROPE
[59] IEA. (1998). Science Achievement in Seventeen Countries: A Preliminary Report.
Toronto: Pergamon Press.
[60] Illinois Next Generation Science Standards
http://www.isbe.net/ngss/default.htm, Illinois State Science Standards
http://www.isbe.net/ils/science/standards.htm, the people to contact for more information
http://www.isbe.net/curriculum/
[61] Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[61b] Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810-824.
[62] Lee, O., and Fradd, S.H. (1996). Interactional patterns of linguistically diverse students and teachers: Insights for promoting science learning.
Linguistics and Education: An International Research Journal, 8(3), 269-297.
[62b] Lee, O., Deaktor, R.A., Hart, J.E., Cuevars, P., and Enders, C. (2005).
An instructional intervention’'s impact on the science and literacy achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 857-887.
[62c] Lee, O., Lewis, S., Adamson, K., Maerten-Rivera, J., and Secada, W. (2007).
Urban elementary school teachers’' knowledge and practices in teaching science to English language learners.
Science Education, 92(4), 733-758.
[62d] Lee, O., and Buxton, C. (2010). Diversity and Equity in Science Education: Theory, Research, and Practice.
New York: Teachers College Press.
64[63] Matin, M. O., Mulis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T. A., Chrostowski, S. J., Garden, R. A., and O'Connor, K. M. (2000).
TIMSS 1999 International Science Report; Findings from IEA's Repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth Grade.
International Study Center Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
65[63b] Matin, M. O., Mulis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T. A., Chrostowski, S. J., Garden, R. A., and O'Connor, K. M. (2001).
Science Benchmarking Report TIMSS 1999: Achievement for US States and Districts in an International Context.
International Study Center Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
[64] National Assessment Governing Board. US Department of Education. (2009).
Science Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
http://www.nagb.org/publications/frameworks/science-09.pdf[June 2011].
[64b] National Assessment Governing Board. US Department of Education. (2010).
Technology and Engineering Literacy Framework for the 2014 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Available:
http://www.nagb.org/publications/frameworks/prepub_naep_tel_framework_2014.pdf [April 2011].
[65] National Assessment of Educational Progress[NAEP] . (2009).
NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress-NCES 2009-479. The Nation's Report Card. National Center for Education Statistics (ED).
[65b] National Assessment of Educational Progress[NAEP]. (2009).
Science Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Developed for the National Assessment Governing Board.
http://www.nagb.org/publications/frameworks/science-09.pdf [June 2011].
[66] National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983).
A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Education Reform-A Report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education United States Department of Education.
Washington, D.C. : U.S. Government Printing Office.
[67] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston
[68] National Depence Education Act(NDEA). (1958)
[68b] National Elementary & Secondary Act(NESA).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_and_Secondary_Education_Act [2013]
[69] National Environmental Education Act(NEEA). (1990)
[69b] National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers.
Available: http://www.ccsso.org/News_and_Events/Press_Releases/NATIONAL_GOVERNORS_ASSOCIATION_AND_STATE_EDUCATION_
CHIEFS_LAUNCH_COMMON_STATE_ACADEMIC_STANDARDS_.html [March 2013]
[70] National Research Council. (1996).
National Science Education Standards. National Committee for Science Education Standards and Assessment. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
[70b] National Research Council. (1999).
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking (Eds.).
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[70c] National Research Council. (2001).
Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Education Assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment.
J.W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, and R. Glaser, Eds. Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education.
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[70d] National Research Council. (2002).
Investigating the Influence of Standards: A framework for Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education.
I.R. Weiss, M.S. Knapp, K.S. Hollweg, and G. Burrill (Eds.), Committee on Understanding the Influence of Standards in K-12 Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[70e] National Research Council. (2003).
Assessment in Support of Instruction and Learning: Bridging the Gap Between Large-Scale and Classroom Assessment.
Committee on Assessment in Support of Instruction and Learning. Board on Testing and Assessment,
Committee on Science Education K-12, Mathematical Sciences Education Board. Center for Education.
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[70f] National Research Council. (2004).
Learning and Instruction: A SERP Research Agenda. Panel on Learning and Instruction. M.S. Donovan and J.W. Pellegrino, Eds.
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[70g] National Research Council. (2006).
America’'s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science.
Committee on High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision, S.R. Singer, M.L. Hilton, and H.A. Schweingruber, Eds.
Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[70h] National Research Council. (2006).
Systems for State Science Assessment. Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement.
M.R. Wilson and M.W. Bertenthal, Eds. Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education.
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[70i] National Research Council. (2007).
Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade.
R.A. Duschl, H.A. Schweingruber, and A.W. Shouse, Eds. Board on Science Education, Center for Education.
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[70j] National Research Council. (2008).
The Role of Theory in Advancing 21st-Century Biology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[70k] National Research Council. (2009).
A New Biology for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[70l] National Research Council. (2009).
Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Committee on K-12 Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council.
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[70m] National Research Council. (2009).
Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments.
P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A.W. Shouse, and M.A. Feder, Eds. Board on Science Education, Center for Education.
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[70n] National Research Council. (2010).
Exploring intersection of Science Education and 21st Century Skills-A workshop Summary.
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[70o] National Research Council. (2010).
Preparing Teachers: Building Evidence for Sound Policy. Committee on the Study of Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States, Center for Education.
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[70p] National Research Council. (2011).
Successful K-12 STEM education: identifying effective approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.
Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.
[70q] National Research Council. (2011).
Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America’'s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads.
Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering Workforce Pipeline, National Research Council.
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[70r] National Research Council. (2012).
A Framework for K-12 Science Education
[70s] National Research Council. (2013).
Next Generation Science Standards
[71] National Science Board. (2010).
Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington. VA: National Science Foundation.
[72] National Science Board Commission on Precollege Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. (1983).
Educating Americans for the 21st Century (a report & source materials). Washington, D.C. :National Science Foundation.
[73] National Science Education Act(NSEA). (2000).
Available: http://faculty.washington.edu/jwilker/353/billSample.pdf [March 2013]
[74] National Science Education Incentive Act(NSEIA). (2001). Available: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-106hr4273ih/content-detail.html [March 2013]
[75] National Science Education Enhancement Act(NSEEA). (2001).
Available: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/107/hr101/text [March 2013]
[76] National Science Foundation Act(NSFA).
[77] National Science Teachers Association.(NSTA). (1991).
Position statement. Washington DC: National Science Teachers Association.
[78] National Science Teachers Association. (1991).
Scope, Sequence, and Coordination
[78b] National Science Teachers Association. (2008).
Science as Inquiry in the Secondary Setting. J. Gess-Newsome, J. Luft, and R.L. Bell (Eds). Washington, DC: Author.
[78c] National Science Teachers Association. (2008).
ESP Monography. Exemplary Science in Informal Education Setting- Standard-based success stories
[78d] National Science Teachers Association. (2009).
Science Anchors. Arlington, VA: Author. Available http://www.nsta.org/involved/cse/scienceanchors.aspx [June 2011].
[79] No Child Left Behind Act(NCLB). (2011/2).
Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Child_Left_Behind_Act [March 2013]
[80] Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984).
Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[81] OECD. (2006).
Assessing scientific, reading, and mathematical literacy: A framework for PSA 2006. Paris: OECD.
[82] OECD. (2010).
PISA 2009 technical report. Paris: OECD.
[83] Pak, Sung-Jae.(2012).
An exemplary study of processes establishing and practicing nationlal science education policy.
presented at The International Conference on Science Education, Najing University, China.
[84] Patrick J. McGuinn. (2006).
No Child Left Behind and the Transformation of Federal Education Policy, 1965-2005, University Press of Kansas
[85] Paul E. Martin R. West. (2003).
No Child left behind?, Brooking Institution Press
[86] President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010).
Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Education for America's Future.
Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.햎/administration/eop/ostp/pcast/docsreports.
[87] Ravitch. Diane. (2010).
The Death and Life of the Great America School System,
[88] Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act(ESEA). (2011)
[89] Rodriguez, A.J. (1997).
The dangerous discourse of invisibility: A critique of the National Research Council’'s national science education standards.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), 19-37.
[90] Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2001).
The implication of coteaching/cogenerative dialogur for teacher evaluation: Learning from multiple perspectives everyday practice.
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15, 7-29.
[90b] Roth, W-M, Tobin, K.G., and Ritchie, S., (2008)
Time and temporality as mediators of science learning. Science Education, 92(1), 115-140.
[91] Sanders, M. (2009).
Integrative STEM education Primer. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
[92] Sanders, W., & Horn, P. (1995).
Educational assessment reassessed: The usefulness of standardized and alternative measures of student achievement as indicators for the assessment of educational outcomes.
Education Policy Analysis Archives, 3(6). Retrieved for http://olam.ed.asu/epaa/v3n6.html
[92b] Schmidt, W.H., McKnight, C.C., and Raizen, S. (1997).
A Splintered Vision: An Investigation of U.S. Science and Mathematics Education. U.S. National Research Center for the Third International Mathematics and Science Study.
Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
[92c] Schmidt, W.H., Wang, H.C., and McKnight, C.C. (2005).
Curriculum coherence: An examination of U.S. mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective.
Journal of Curriculum Studies, (37)5, 525-559.
[93] Schmidt, W.H. (2011).
STEM reform: Which way to go? Paper presented at the National Research Council Workshop on Successful STEM Education in K-12 Schools.
Retrieved from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/STEM Schools Workshop Paper Schmidt.pdf.
[94] Schwab, J.J. (1962).
The Teaching of Science as Enquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[95] Settage, J., & Meadows, L. (2002).
Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences:
Implications for science education within America's urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 114-127.
[96] Siegel, H. (2002).
Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education: In search of common ground.
Science Education, 86(6), 803-820.
[97] TIMSS. (1995). Third Int'l Math and Science Study
[98] Urban, Wayne J. (2010).
More Than Science and Sputnik - The National Depense Education Act of 1958, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa
[99] U.S. Census Bureau. (2012).
Statistical abstract of the United States, 2012. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from
http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/education.html
[100] U.S. Congress. (2001).
National mathematics and science partnerships act of 2002. Washington, DC: Author.
[101] U.S. Council on competitiveness. (2004).
Innovate America.
[102] U.S. Department of Education [USDoE]. (2007).
Report of the Academic Competitiveness of Council. Washington, D.C. Retrieved August 5, 2011 from
http://www.ed.햎/about/inits/ed/competitiveness/acc-mathscience/index.html
[102b] U.S. Department of Education. (2010).
A Blueprint for Reform-The Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.
[102c] U.S. Department of Education's documents on Highly Qualified Teachers as mandated by No Child Left Behind
http://www2.ed.gov/teachers/nclbguide/improve-quality.html
[103] Wilson, S. (2011). Effective STEM teacher preparation, induction, and professional development.
Paper presented at the National Research Council Workshop on Successful STEM Education in K-12 Schools. from
http:..www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/STEM_Schools_Workshop_Paper_Wilson.pd
[104] Yager, R. E., & Enger, S. K.(eds). (2006).
Exemplary science in : standards-based success stories. NSTA press,


과학문화교육연구소